Tel: +86-18025912990 | Email: wst01@winsharethermal.com
Blog
English
Views: 2 Author: Site Editor Publish Time: 2026-01-07 Origin: Site
When comparing thermal management for Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS), immersion cooling offers superior safety performance, particularly in preventing thermal runaway, compared to traditional liquid plate cooling. While liquid plates are a mature and cost-effective solution for general heat dissipation, immersion cooling's direct-contact method provides unparalleled temperature uniformity and a critical, built-in fire suppression capability. This article delves into a detailed comparison of these two critical technologies, evaluating their impact on safety, performance, longevity, and total cost of ownership.
A Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) is a finely balanced electrochemical powerhouse. Its ability to store vast amounts of energy is also its greatest vulnerability. Efficiently managed heat doesn't just reduce performance; it is the primary line of defense for the safety and reliability of the entire system.
Thermal runaway is a devastating chain reaction that begins when a single battery cell overheats. If this heat cannot be dissipated quickly enough, the temperature spirals upwards, causing the cell to vent flammable gases and catch fire. The intense heat then radiates to neighbors, triggering them as well. This propagation can destroy an entire BESS container in minutes.
Liquid plate cooling, often called indirect liquid cooling, is currently the most common technology used in BESS. It uses a liquid coolant to draw heat away through metal plates.
Metal plates with internal channels are placed in thermal contact with battery modules. A coolant (water-glycol) is pumped through these plates. Heat conducts from the cell, through the thermal interface material (TIM), and into the plate. This is an indirect method because the coolant never touches the cells.
Inefficient Mitigation: Indirect plates are poorly positioned to absorb sudden, intense internal heat during a runaway event.
Temperature Gradients: Cooling is only applied to the surface, creating "hot spots" furthest from the plate.
Leakage Risk: A water-based leak inside a high-voltage enclosure can cause short circuits.
Immersion cooling submerges battery cells directly into a specialized, non-conductive (dielectric) liquid, eliminating thermal barriers.
Battery modules are placed in a sealed enclosure filled with dielectric fluid. The fluid absorbs heat from every surface of every cell simultaneously. It is then circulated to a heat exchanger and returned to the tank.
| Feature | Liquid Plate Cooling | Immersion Cooling |
|---|---|---|
| Runaway Mitigation | Poor to Fair (Indirect/Slow) | Excellent (Proactive/Isolation) |
| Temp Uniformity | Fair (Gradients present) | Excellent (Minimal ΔT) |
| Heat Transfer | Moderate (Multiple layers) | Very High (Direct contact) |
| Initial Cost (CAPEX) | Lower (Mature/Standard) | Higher (Specialized fluids/seals) |
| Battery Lifespan | Standard | Extended (Superior temp control) |
For Maximum Safety and Performance: Immersion cooling is the superior choice. It is ideal for utility-scale, data centers, or high-density urban installations where failure propagation must be prevented.
For Cost-Sensitive, Lower-Density Applications: Liquid plate cooling remains a viable option. It is a mature and cost-effective solution for residential or small commercial systems where risk profiles are lower.
Can immersion cooling stop thermal runaway?
It cannot stop an initial internal cell defect, but it is highly effective at absorbing the energy burst to stop propagation to adjacent cells.
Is immersion cooling significantly more expensive?
Upfront costs (CAPEX) are higher, but the extended battery lifespan can lead to a lower Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) over time.
